Baldwin v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by Frederick E. Baldwin (the John Simmons Company, intervener) against the Abercrombie & Fitch Company (the Justrite Manufacturing Company, intervener) for infringement of patent for acetylene gas-generating lamp. On final hearing.
1Opinion of the Court
MAYER, District Judge.
The original of this reissue (No. 821,850) was before the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Bleser v. Baldwin, 199 Fed. 133, 117 C. C. A. 615, and (inter alia)’ was held valid, but not infringed. The opinion is dated April 23, 1912, and on February 5, 1913, Baldwin filed his application for a reissue, which was granted on March 11, 1913, only about five weeks thereafter.
This reissue patent was recently considered by Judge Orr in the Western District of Pennsylvania, in Baldwin v. Grier Brothers Company, 215 Fed. 735, and by him held valid. Since the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Hutter v. De Q. Bottle Stopper Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Condit Electrical Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. LaemmleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- John Simmons Co. v. Grier Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Naivette, Inc. v. BishingerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
- National Nut Co. of California v. Sontag Chain Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.