Legal Opinion
Sea Cabins on the Ocean IV Homeowners Ass'n v. City of North Myrtle Beach
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 11, 2001No. 25307PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURNETT, Justice:
Petitioners Sea Cabins on the Ocean TV Homeowners Association, Inc., et al., (Sea Cabins) brought this inverse condemnation action against Respondent City of North Myrtle Beach (City) alleging certain “affirmative and aggressive actions” by City constituted an unconstitutional temporary taking of their private pier for public use without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, § 13 of the South Carolina Constitution. The master-in-equity agreed and awarded Sea Cabins $900,000 as just compensation for the temporary…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Town of Flower Mound v. Stafford Estates Ltd. PartnershipTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Sunrise Corp. of Myrtle Beach v. City of Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Byrd v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Pheasant Bridge Corp. v. Township of WarrenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Denene, Inc. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.