Legal Opinion
Denene, Inc. v. City of Charleston
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided May 24, 2004No. 25829PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice WALLER:
Appellants filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to invalidate an ordinance requiring that all commercial establishments within the city of Charleston, which serve alcohol for on-site consumption, close at 2 a.m. Both appellants and the City of Charleston (City) moved for summary judgment. The trial court denied appellants’ motion for summary judgment and granted City’s motion. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 18, 2000, City enacted an ordinance requiring that: Commercial establishments which allow for the on-premises consumption of beer, ale, porter and/or wine shall be prohibited…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Byrd v. City of HartsvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Hill v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
- Dunes West Golf Club, LLC v. Town of Mount PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
- Harbit v. City of CharlestonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009
- Bodman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2013
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.