Legal Opinion
Sunrise Corp. of Myrtle Beach v. City of Myrtle Beach
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided August 26, 2005No. 04-2171PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WIDENER wrote the opinion, in which Judge WILKINSON and Judge NIEMEYER concurred.
WIDENER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs, Sunrise Corporation of Myrtle Beach, Boulevard Development LLC, and S & H Development, Inc. (collectively Sunrise), 1 appeal from the district court’s granting of defendant the City of Myrtle Beach’s (Myrtle Beach) motions for summary judgment. 2 In the underlying ease Sunrise was seeking damages for violations of the Due Process, Equal Protection and Takings Clauses of the Constitution under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- MLC AUTOMOTIVE, LLC v. Town of Southern PinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Thomas v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Weigel v. MarylandDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Mary's House, Inc. v. North CarolinaDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Quinn v. Board of County Commissioners for Queen Anne's CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.