State Farm Lloyds v. Kessler
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAUPHINOT, Justice.
Appellants State Farm Lloyds and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (“State Farm”) bring this appeal of a judgment declaring that they have a duty to defend Ap-pellees Paul and Mary Kessler (“The Kes-slers”) in a suit pending against them. In two points of error, State Farm alleges that the trial court erred “because, as a matter of law, appellants owe no duty to defend since the pleadings in the suit against the Kesslers allege no claim for ‘property damage’ [or] ... for damages caused by an ‘occurrence’ or ‘loss.’ ”
Disposition
We hold that State Farm has no duty…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Forbau Ex Rel. Miller v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
- Heyden Newport Chemical Corp. v. Southern General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
- Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MaupinTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- North Alamo Water Supply Corp. v. Willacy County Appraisal DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1991
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Cyprus Amax Minerals Co. v. Lexington Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2003
- St. Paul Insurance Co. v. Texas Department of Transportation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Stewart v. HardieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Texas Department of Banking v. Mount Olivet Cemetery Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
- Frasier v. Yanes, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.