Legal Opinion

Katze v. Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1984No. 81-1073PublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*208STEINMETZ, J.

The issues in this case are whether the transaction of sale of cattle by an insured to a person purchasing them under a fraudulent scheme is a theft under this insurance policy and whether it is a direct loss of the cattle.

The plaintiff, Harry Katze, started suit in Columbia county circuit court, the Honorable Howard Latton, to recover under the theft provisions of defendant’s, Randolph & Scott Mutual Fire Insurance Company, insurance policy. The case was submitted to a jury which made findings favorable to the plaintiff on the insurance coverage issues. On motions after verdict,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garriguenc v. LoveWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mutual Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Wisconsin Wire WorksWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. McPhee v. American Motorists InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Zehren v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Bauman v. Midland Union InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Just v. Land Reclamation Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Danbeck v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Wisconsin Auto Title Loans, Inc. v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Bradley Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Smith v. KatzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API