Legal Opinion

Bateman v. Blaisdell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1890PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, C. J.

This action is replevin, under which the plaintiff seized a piano and certain household goods claimed in the declaration to be of the value of $300. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and findings of fact and law made upon request of the parties. The record states that after the request was filed, and after the trial, the circuit judge directed defendants" attorney to prepare a draft of the findings, which he did, and the same were signed by the judge on October 10, 1889. J3aid findings were afterwards amended, and the amended and completed findings were filed on January 20,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bateman v. BlakeMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Neumann v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crampton v. CramptonMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Hoffman v. SilverthornMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Bateman v. Grand Rapids & Indiana RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Congdon v. BaileyMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Blaisdell v. ScallyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API