Legal Opinion

Congdon v. Bailey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Newaygo; Edwards, J. Replevin by William Oongdon against John Bailey. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action in replevin begun in justice’s court. From a judgment obtained by the plaintiff, the defendant appealed the case to the circuit court, where it was tried without a jury by the judge, who made the following findings:

“1. That on September 9, 1897, the plaintiff was the owner and in the possession of all the property described in the writ and declaration in this 'case, which property did not exceed in value the sum of $100.
“2. That on said day George W. Congdon, an infant son of the plaintiff, then of the age of about 19 years, without the knowledge or consent of the plaintiff,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. County Treasurer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Edwards v. NelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Bateman v. BlaisdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Mills v. Van CampMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Becker v. HeadstenMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Bockes v. A. McAfee & Son Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Kophal v. WeisenbergerMichigan Supreme Court · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API