Legal Opinion

Blaisdell v. Scally

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Kent. (Burch, J.) Case. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

This is an action of trespass on the case for the taking of. a piano, claimed to belong to plaintiff. The piano is one of the articles mentioned in a certain mortgage, which was found to have been wholly paid and satisfied in the case of Bateman v. Blaisdell, 83 Mich. 3571. The defendant is a deputy-sheriff of Kent county, and, at the time of the commencement of this suit, had possession of the piano, under the writ of replevin in that case. On the trial of the case at bar,, the jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $200.

There is a dispute as to when Scally took possession of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bateman v. BlaisdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maycroft v. Jennings FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Bamlet Realty Co. v. DoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API