Bateman v. Blake
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent. (Burch, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCahill, J.
This was an action of replevin, brought to recover the possession of certain household goods. The plaintiff claims them under two chattel mortgages, — one for $65, given by the defendant and his wife, June 15, 1887; and one for $11, given by the same parties, October 13, 1887. The defendant claims that these mortgages are paid; that this suit was not only commenced without right, but was prosecuted in a manner and under such circumstances as to be oppressive, and to entitle the defendant to claim damages therefor from the plaintiff. In the court below, the defendant recovered a judgment for…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chandler v. AllisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fleet Business Credit, LLC v. Krapohl Ford Lincoln Mercury Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007
- Kratze v. Independent Order of OddfellowsMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
- Gladwin State Bank v. DowMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Zimmerman v. WhiteleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
- Multiplex Concrete MacHinery Co. v. SaxerMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.