City of Tucson v. Sims
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.
In this action, certain residents of Menlo Park subdivision, adjacent to the city of Tucson, sought to recover from the latter amounts they had been required to pay for domestic water in excess of the sums paid by those living within the corporate limits of the city, and from a judgment in their favor the city appeals.
The Pima Realty Company, it appears from the record, owned Menlo Park subdivision, a tract of land just outside the western boundary of the city of Tucson which had been divided into lots and blocks and whose streets and alleys had been dedicated to the public. In 1914 the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pikes Peak Power Co. v. City of Colorado SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
- City of Henderson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
- Milligan v. City of Miles CityMontana Supreme Court · 1915
- Orme v. Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1923
- Keever v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Murphy v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939
- Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Phoenix v. State Ex Rel. ConwayArizona Supreme Court · 1938
- Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.