Legal Opinion

Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2003No. CV-02-0091-PRPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JONES, Chief Justice.

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether irrigation districts have authority, under the constitution and statutes of Arizona, to provide electricity to customers outside established district boundaries. Because we answer in the affirmative, we vacate the decision of the court of appeals and reinstate the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Hohokam Irrigation and Drainage District. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Article 6, Section 5(3), of the Arizona Constitution.

FACTS/PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Hohokam Irrigation and Drainage…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank v. Arizona Laborers, Teamsters & Cement Masons Local No. 395 Pension Trust FundArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Mail Boxes v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  5. City of Phoenix v. KasunArizona Supreme Court · 1939

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Washburn v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. Adams v. Commission on Appellate Court AppointmentsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Clean Elections Institute, Inc. v. BrewerArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Hancock v. BisnarArizona Supreme Court · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API