Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 30, 1950No. 5209PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STANFORD, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order and judgment of the Superior Court dismissing appellant’s complaint against the appellee, Roosevelt Irrigation District.
George Taylor, deceased hiisband of this appellant, arranged with David A. Grout, the other' defendant herein, who- was in charge, control and legal possession of a portion of the Southeast quarter of sec-tion 12, Township 1 North, Range 1 East, Maricopa County, Arizona, to pasture certain cattle upon such land. Grout, it is alleged, represented to Taylor that the enclosure was safe, suitable and fit for the purpose of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation Dist. No. 1 v. WarfordArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Jones v. City of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1925
- State of Arizona v. Yuma Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Sumid v. City of PrescottArizona Supreme Court · 1924
- Salt River Valley Water Users' Ass'n v. BlakeArizona Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Louis Gorenc v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
- Valley National Bank v. Electrical District Number FourArizona Supreme Court · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.