City of Phoenix v. Kasun
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— This is an action by George Kasun and Mary Kasun, his wife, hereinafter called plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, under section 3736, Revised Code of 1928, against the City of Phoenix, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called defendant, asking for an injunction against the latter’s attempting to enforce a certain ordinance adopted by it increasing the water rates to be paid by consumers outside of the city limits. The substance of the complaint was that the ordinance raising the rate was void because the amount charged for service to the outside consumers…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Shirk v. Lancaster CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Childs v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- American Aniline Products, Inc. v. Lock HavenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Barnes Laundry Co. v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- City of Englewood v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1951
- Faxe v. City of GrandviewWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Zepp v. Mayor & Council of the City of AthensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Georgia Power Co. v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Iowa State Commerce Commission v. Northern Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1968
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.