Legal Opinion
Cox v. Peerless Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 21, 1991No. Civ. N-89-320 (WWE)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
EGINTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff brings this diversity action seeking payment on an insurance contract, pursuant to Connecticut General Statutes § 38-175. Plaintiff alleges that defendant is contractually liable for the payment of prejudgment interest, post-judgment interest, and court costs, all arising out of a personal injury action in which a judgment was entered in 1988. Plaintiff has made an offer of judgment in the instant action, and therefore seeks prejudgment interest in this case as well. The parties have submitted individual trial memoranda and a joint…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gionfriddo v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Brown v. Employer's Reinsurance Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Plasticrete Corp. v. American Policyholders InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Jurrius v. MacCabees Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Murphy v. Marmon Group, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- Vázquez-Filippetti v. Cooperativa De Seguros Múltiples De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Mayer v. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Ass'nMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- In Re Smith Corona Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 1997
- Verna Marie Grimes v. Keith Allen SwaimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Armacost v. Amica Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.