Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Marmon Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 3, 1983No. Civ. A. B-81-554PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO STRIKE
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
I
This is an action by plaintiff, Phyllis S. Murphy, seeking monetary damages and declaratory relief from the defendant, Marmon Group, Inc. (“Marmon”), for its failure to pay her one-half of the proceeds under a deferred compensation plan that had allegedly been assigned to her. Approximately four months after institution of the suit, Murphy made an offer of judgment in the amount of eighty thousand ($80,000) dollars pursuant to Conn.Gen.Stat. § 52-192a. 1 Marmon responded by filing a motion to strike plaintiff’s offer of judgment.
Marmon first…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. AugustSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sidney Roginsky v. Richardson-Merrell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cox v. Peerless InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1991
- Hardy v. Saliva Diagnostic Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
- Armacost v. Amica Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
- Mission National Insurance v. SchulmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1986