Legal Opinion

Sublett v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1999No. CR 97-49PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

W. H.“Dub” Arnold, Chief Justice.

Pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. section 5-14-103(a)(1), the State charged appellant, Dennis Sublett, with two counts of rape by forcible compulsion of his daughters, D.S. and A.S. The trials were severed, and the trial involving D.S. proceeded first and is the subject of the instant appeal. Appellant was convicted of the rape of D.S. and sentenced to life imprisonment in the Arkansas Department of Correction. From that conviction comes the instant appeal, challenging the sufficiency of the evidence. Our jurisdiction is authorized pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. Rule…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gillie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Freeman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Trotter v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Strawhacker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Curtis v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Fudge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Polk v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. Howard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Baughman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API