Polk v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
JIM HANNAH, Justice.
The State of Arkansas petitions for review of the court of appeals’ partial reversal of Appellant/ Respondent Jewell Polk Jr.’s convictions of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, simultaneous possession of drugs and firearm, and theft by receiving. The court of appeals in Polk v. State, 75 Ark. App. 338, 57 S.W.3d 781 (2001), affirmed Polk’s conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver, but reversed his convictions for simultaneous possession of drugs and firearms and theft by receiving.
At 2:30 a.m. on April 22, 1999,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Sheridan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
- Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Fultz v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Durham v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
- Mings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- George v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Garner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- McKenzie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Tubbs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.