Legal Opinion

Trotter v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 10, 1986No. CR 86-112PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

In this appeal, the appellant challenges the admissibility of a confession purportedly made by him, and the sufficiency of the evidence of aggravated robbery. We find the evidence was not sufficient to warrant the conviction and, accordingly, reduce the sentence to that prescribed for the lesser included offense of first degree battery. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Sup. Ct. R. 29(l)(b).

The facts supporting the charge as gleaned from the testimony of the victims and an accomplice, were as follows. The appellant and a friend, Lawrence Benson, walked into Bob’s…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  4. Thomerson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  5. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Bangs v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Shields v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Gillie v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Hodge v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Owens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API