Legal Opinion

Hinson v. Cameron

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 9, 1987No. 64159PublishedCited by 135 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*551OPALA, Justice.

Two questions are presented on certiora-ri: [1] Did an at-will employee, dismissed for her failure to perform an assigned duty, state a cause of action in tort for wrongful discharge from employment? and [2] Did the employee manual alter an at-will relationship between the plaintiff and her employer? We answer both questions in the negative and reinstate the trial court’s summary judgment for the defendants.

In an action against Patricia Cameron [Cameron or supervisor] and Comanche County Hospital Authority [Hospital], Nita Hinson [Hinson] sought damages for what we characterize…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Kelsay v. Motorola, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by135 opinions

  1. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Buckner v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Melnick v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Frazier v. Bryan Memorial Hospital AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

130 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API