C&H POWER LINE CONSTRUCTION CO. v. ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS OPERATING, LLC
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtWinchester, J.
¶ 1 The appellants/defendants, Enterprise Products Operating, LLC, and Enterprise Texas Pipeline, LLC, [hereinafter “Enterprise”] have raised issues regarding jury instructions, denial by the trial court of their motion for directed verdict, exclusion of evidence offered by the appellants, inclusion of inadmissible evidence, acceptance of a less than unanimous verdict, and awarding improper interest on the judgment. We hold that the trial court did not make any error requiring reversal or remand. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I. FACTS
¶ 2 The plaintiff/appellee, C&H Power Line…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thor Power Tool Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. v. SevcikTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Veiser v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Florafax International Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- Kamo Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
- BEASON v. I. E. MILLER SERVICES, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.