In the Welfare of T.N.Y.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge
Appellant T.N.Y. argues that the evidence is insufficient to support his adjudication of delinquency for' an assault in the second degree. Because the juvenile court based its finding of an intent to cause fear of immediate bodily harm solely on the effect T.N.Y.’s actions had on the victim police officer, and the record does not otherwise support a finding of intent, we reverse.
FACTS
St. Paul police executed a search warrant for appellant T.N.Y.’s family’s home. At the time, only children were in the home. The children testified that they were fearful based on the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Dufrane v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Matter of Welfare of A. J. B.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2019
- In re A.J.B.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- Abdullahi Aden Ibrahim v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. A., Jr., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. N. K., Child.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.