Legal Opinion

State v. Zulu

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 27, 2005No. A04-2327PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STONEBURNER, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree, arguing that the district court abused its discretion by admitting evidence prejudicial to appellant. Appellant also challenges the upward durational sentencing departure imposed by the district court, arguing that (1) his waiver of a jury determination of aggravating sentencing factors was not knowing, intelligent, and voluntary; (2) he did not waive his right to á jury determination of whether the alleged criminal conduct occurred after the effective date of amendments to Minn.Stat.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. PostSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  3. State v. AmosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
  4. State v. NunnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of the Welfare of: D. M. B., ChildCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  2. State of Minnesota v. John Joseph LynchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
  3. State of Minnesota v. Raymont Michael RedmondCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024
  4. State of Minnesota v. Walter Pierre ThomasCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API