Legal Opinion

MIRACLE AUTO CENTER v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1998No. A082128PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORRIGAN, J.

Here we conclude that the term “standard time,” when used in a general commercial liability insurance policy to determine coverage expiration, means the time currently in use in the state whether standard Pacific time or daylight saving time is in effect.

Factual and Procedural Background

A motion for summary judgment established the following uncontradicted facts. Petitioners are Miracle Auto Center, doing business as Shoffner’s Miracle Auto Mart, and Paris F. and Beverly V. Shoffner (collectively referred to as petitioner). At 12:49 a.m. on June 29, 1997, a police officer…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. AIU Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Swenson v. FileCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Sierra Craft, Inc. v. Magnum Enterprises, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Washington International Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Progressive West Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. People v. PatelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Peerless Lighting Corp. v. American Motorists Ins.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  4. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2006
  5. GREE, INC v. SUPERCELL OYDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API