Legal Opinion

Morton Engineering & Construction, Inc. v. Patscheck

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 7, 2001No. F033184PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CORNELL, J.

Respondent Morton Engineering & Construction, Inc. (Morton), was hired by appellant Stanley Douglas Patscheck (Patscheck), as a subcontractor on a public works project. Patscheck failed to pay Morton for its work. Morton obtained a judgment that included penalties for failure to pay progress payments and retention proceeds within the time required by Business and Professions Code section 7108.5 1 and Public Contract Code section 7107.

Patscheck appeals asserting the penalty provision in section 7108.5 can only be awarded in a disciplinary action before the Contractors’ State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co.California Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Solberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. People v. SnookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United Riggers & Erectors, Inc. v. Coast Iron & Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 2018
  2. California State University, Fresno Ass'n v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. FEI Enterprises Inc. v. YoonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Leader v. CordsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  5. Yassin v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API