Legal Opinion

Becker v. IRM Corp.

California Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1985No. S.F. 24618PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROUSSARD, J.

In this personal injury action plaintiff’s complaint asserted causes of action of strict liability and negligence against defendant landlord. Defendant moved for summary judgment urging that a landlord is not liable to a tenant for a latent defect of the rented premises absent concealment of a known danger or an expressed contractual or statutory duty to repair. The trial court granted the motion and denied a motion for reconsideration. Plaintiff appeals.1

We have concluded that the trial court erred as to both causes of action.

The complaint alleged that plaintiff was…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Escola v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Ray v. Alad Corp.California Supreme Court · 1977

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Acosta-Mestre v. Hilton International of Puerto Rico, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Shump v. First Continental-Robinwood AssociatesOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Brantley v. PisaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Lopez v. McDonald's Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1987
  5. O'CAIN v. Harvey Freeman and Sons, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1991

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API