Legal Opinion

Green v. Coleman-Nelson Corp.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 29, 1925No. 15750PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THREADGILL, C.

This action was commenced March 11, 1922, by plaintiff in error, as plaintiff, against defendant in' error, as defendant, to recover $7,038.94 for 3,043.32 barrels of Osage crude oil delivered through plaintiff’s pipe line to defendant’s tanks in West Tulsa 'during the month of January, 1922. Plaintiff claimed that the verbal agreement, ratified by the correspondence, provided that the receivers, of the Mid-Co Petroleum Company would furnish to defendant 1,000 barrels maximum or 800 barrels minimum per day, at 45 cents above the posted marker, price of the Prairie Oil…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Standard Lumber Co. v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Moffitt-West Drug Co. v. ByrdCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899
  4. Murdock v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Southwestern Coal Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. British American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Mylander v. PageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
  3. Quincy Johnston, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Standard Pipe & Supply Co. v. Oil State Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Quincy Johnston, Inc. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API