Murdock v. Jones
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal Try the defendant, The International Tile and Trim Company, from a judgment of the City Court of Brooklyn in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of said court on the llth day of September, 1894, upon the report of a referee.
1Opinion of the Court
Cullen, J.:
The plaintiff, in September, 1889, entered into a contract with the defendant Jones, by which the former 'was to construct a dwelling house for a specified sum. In December of the same year the plaintiff entered into a contract with the defendant, the' tile company, whereby the latter was to furnish the trim' and 'cabinet work for the house, but not to set them in. place, for the sum of $4,946. Shortly after the house was finished or claimed to be finished the plaintiff filed a mechanic’s lien for the balance due him on his contract with the defendant Jones and for certain extra…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Booth v. . Spuyten Duyvil Rolling Mill Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by10 opinions
- Menorah Nursing Home, Inc. v. ZukovAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Standard Lumber Co. v. Miller & Vidor Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Long v. American Surety Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Meyer v. HavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Green v. Coleman-Nelson Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.