Legal Opinion
Consolidated Pipe Line Co. v. British American Oil Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 11, 1933No. 20999PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBusby, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court of Tulsa county, Okla. The action was commenced in the trial court by the defendant in error, British American Oil Company, Ltd., as plaintiff therein. The action was based on an alleged breach of contract for the sale of crude oil when the plaintiff sought to recover general and special damages for breach of contract for failure to deliver such oil in accordance with the contract. The cause was tried to the court and the judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for the sum of $13,770/28, together with costs.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Federal Trade Commission v. Pacific States Paper Trade Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Stewart v. Griffith Ex Rel. BallSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Wilcoxson v. StittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Dana v. St. Paul Investment Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Langdon v. Saga Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1977
- State Ex Rel. Roth v. WaterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Sunray DX Oil Co. v. Great Lakes Carbon Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Wills v. National Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Watson v. American Creosote Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.