Legal Opinion
Hewitt v. Apollo Group
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 22, 1992No. C4-92-671PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellants, Apollo Group and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, challenge the trial court order denying them a workers’ compensation subrogation recovery and awarding the entire proceeds of a third-party settlement with a negligent tortfeasor to respondent, Kathleen J. Hewitt.
FACTS
Respondent is employed with appellant Apollo Group as a recruiter for candidates for the Cardinal Stritch College masters program. Respondent’s job requires her to travel to various locations to give seminars to recruit candidates. On October 10,1989, while in the course and scope of her…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Westendorf Ex Rel. Westendorf v. StassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Trondson v. JanikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Henning v. WinemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Target Corp. v. Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- United Fire & Casualty Co. v. ArmantroutColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re Approval of Settlement & Distribution of Wrongful Death Proceeds for the Next of Kin of MarkusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- Hewitt v. Apollo GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992