Legal Opinion
Hewitt v. Apollo Group
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 22, 1992No. C4-92-671Published
1Opinion of the Court
490 N.W.2d 898 (1992)
Kathleen J. HEWITT, Respondent,
v.
APOLLO GROUP, et al., Appellants.
No. C4-92-671.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
September 22, 1992.
Review Denied November 17, 1992.
Michael M. Bader, St. Paul, for respondent.
Roderick C. Cosgriff, Janet Stellpflug, Minneapolis, for appellants.
Considered and decided by HUSPENI, P.J., and NORTON and FOLEY,[*] JJ.
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Appellants, Apollo Group and United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, challenge the trial court order denying them a workers' compensation subrogation recovery and awarding the entire proceeds of a third-party…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- A. J. Chromy Construction Co. v. Commercial Mechanical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Kaiser v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Westendorf Ex Rel. Westendorf v. StassonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Trondson v. JanikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Henning v. WinemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.