Legal Opinion
Trondson v. Janikula
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 27, 1990No. C1-89-780PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEITH, Justice.
This case is before us to determine the property interests of appellants Floyd C. Sjostrand and Arlene J. Sjostrand (the Sjostrands) as opposed to respondents, the limited partners of Grand Chicago Limited Partnership (Chicago Partnership), in an apartment building known as 3939 Chicago Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota. The district court found in favor of the Sjostrands, declaring that Duane Janikula (Janikula), the general partner of Chicago Partnership, had authority to convey the property, and his assignment of the Chicago Partnership’s interest in the contract for deed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hydra-Mac, Inc. v. Onan Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- First National Bank of St. Paul v. RamierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Marks v. City of TucumcariNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1979
- CAROGA REALTY COMPANY v. TapperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Wessels, Arnold & Henderson v. National Medical Waste, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Joseph W. Michalski, Jeanette Michalski, Robert G. Michalski, Paulette R. Michalski v. Bank of America Arizona, an Arizona CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- Banbury v. Omnitrition International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Jacobs v. Pickands Mather & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.