Legal Opinion
Target Corp. v. Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided January 31, 2013No. 12CA0445PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HAWTHORNE.
1 1 Defendant, Prestige Maintenance USA, Ltd. (Prestige), appeals the trial court's judgment awarding future damages to plaintiff, Target Corporation (Target).' We affirm.
12 We publish this opinion because we conclude that, as matters of first impression in Colorado, for choice of law purposes: (1) the sufficiency of evidence supporting a damages award is a substantive issue; and (2) whether an issue is preserved for appeal is an issue of judicial administration.
I. Facts and Procedural History
3 Prestige had contracted with Target to provide cleaning services at…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Arkoma Basin Exploration Co. v. FMF Associates 1990-A, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Berra v. SPRINGER AND STEINBERG, PCColorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- Carpenter v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Swanson v. Image Bank, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
- Hansen v. GAB Business Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Battle North, LLC v. Sensible Housing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Core-Mark Midcontinent Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- In re Estate of OwensColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Great Am. Opportunities, Inc. v. KentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2018
- Mountain States Adjustment v. CookeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.