Legal Opinion
Avemco. Life Ins. v. Luebker
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 21, 1966No. 5-3790PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Osro Cobb, Justice.
Upon trial to a jury, appellee recovered judgment against appellant for total disability benefits under a certain sick and accident policy issued to appellee by appellant. For reversal appellant urges the following four points:
No. 1. The verdict is not supported by the evidence.
No. 2. In the alternative, the appellee is at most partially disabled and the judgment should be reduced accordingly.
No. 3. It was error for the court to give plaintiff’s requested Instruction No. 3.
No. 4. It was error for the court to give plaintiff’s requested Instruction No. 4.
Appellant’s Points 1…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
- Franklin Life Insurance v. BurgessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946
- Alexander v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Monarch Life Insurance v. RiddleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
3Cited by7 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- Lasser v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Gammill v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. WhitleyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.