Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Clark

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 17, 1973No. 73-67PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant, Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, issued a total disability policy to appellee, Carey E. Clark, in which the term total disability is defined to mean "... a disability which wholly and continuously disables the member so that he can perform no duty pertaining to his occupation and during which he is not engaged in any occupation for remuneration or profit. . . .” To reverse a judgment, entered on a jury verdict, in favor of appellee for total disability benefits, appellant contends:

“I. The court erred in overruling the defendant’s motion for directed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pacific Mut. L. Ins. Co. v. McCraryTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  2. OCCIDENTAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. OF CAL. v. SammonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1954
  3. Alexander v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  4. Avemco. Life Ins. v. LuebkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
  5. New York Life Insurance Co. v. DandridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brasher v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1991
  2. Moots v. Bankers Life Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API