Legal Opinion

Gammill v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 4, 2001No. 00-1354PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

This case presents us with the opportunity to clarify the law as it pertains to “total disability” clauses in insurance policies. At issue is whether or not a cardiologist was totally disabled following an accident which left him unable to perform many of the duties of his occupation.

In 1994, Dr. Todd Gammill purchased two disability insurance policies — an individual disability income policy and business overhead expense policy — with Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, listing his occupation on the application as “invasive cardiologist.”1 Under the terms of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Aetna Life Insurance Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. FooteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  3. Continental Casualty Company v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Norris Ex Rel. Thomas v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  5. Robinson v. BeaumontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance v. DaggettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  2. Linda Fuller v. Hartford Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. of Arkansas, Inc. v. Running M Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  4. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance v. Arkansas Department of Environmental QualitySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. First National Bank of CrossettCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API