Legal Opinion

Friedman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 16, 1964No. A.R.D. 178; Entry No. 8935, etcPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KichaedsoN, Judge:

This is an application by the importer for a

review of the decision and judgment of a single judge, sitting in reappraisement, in Morris Friedman v. United States, 50 Cust. Ct. 461, Reap. Dec. 10504, and holding that the appraised values represent the proper dutiable values of the involved merchandise.

The only questions presented concern the dutiable status of certain inland freight and f.o.b. Japan charges which were added on appraise^ ment to the invoice unit prices on all of the involved entries, and certain so-called “buying commissions” in varying amounts which were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. HerrmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
  2. United States v. Kurt Orban Co.United States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Shalom & Co.United States Customs Court · 1966
  2. B & W Wholesale Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  3. Ontario Stone Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  4. Bushnell International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  5. Mannesmann-Meer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API