Legal Opinion

United States v. Shalom & Co.

United States Customs Court

Decided December 20, 1966No. A.R.D. 216; Entry No. 877051PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richaedson, Judge:

The instant application was filed by the Government for a review of the decision and judgment of a single judge sitting in reappraisement in Shalom & Co. v. United States, 56 Cust. Ct. 625, Reap. Dec. 11141, decided February 14, 1966, and holding that export value, represented herein by the appraised values less a 5 percent buying commission computed on the basis of the f.o.b. price, is the proper basis of value of the involved transistor radios and their accessory parts.

The merchandise at bar was exported from Japan, entered at New York, and advanced in value upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. United States v. Nelson Bead Co.United States Customs Court · 1953
  3. Shalom v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Nelson Bead Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Park Avenue Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Reliance International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Carolina Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. International Fashions v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  5. Mitsubishi International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API