Legal Opinion

Mannesmann-Meer, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 9, 1969No. A.R.D. 253; Entry Nos. 592; 821; 944; 1256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

In this application for review, appellant (plaintiff) challenges a, reapraisement decision of the trial judge (Judge Donlon) sustaining the government’s appraised values in four cases that were consolidated for trial. Mannesmann-Meer, Inc. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 697, R.D. 11243 (1966). The merchandise, which was imported from West Germany, was appraised by the government on the basis of constructed value — as set forth in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (19 U.S.C. (1964 ed.) § 1401a (d)). Appellant claims…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  2. Mannesmann-Merr, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Omega Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Border Brokerage Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. C. Pappas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Robert E. Landweer & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. American Greiner Electronic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  3. Service Afloat, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  4. Picker Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API