Legal Opinion

Friedman v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 9, 1963No. Reap. Dec. 10504; Entry No. 8935, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ford, Judge:

The cases listed in schedule “A,” annexed hereto and made a part hereof, were consolidated for the purpose of trial. The merchandise described as fishing rods was appraised at given unit f.o.b. prices. The merchandise described as baseball gloves was appraised at the unit invoice values, plus certain charges, plus 3 per centum commission in all cases except two, i.e., reappraisements 286446-A, which included a 4 per centum commission, and 286444-A, in which no commission was added.

Plaintiff herein contends that the correct dutiable value of the merchandise described as fishing…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API