Legal Opinion

Bushnell International, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 16, 1971No. A.R.D. 297; Entry Nos. 214565; 223098; 209945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kao, Chief Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment of Watson, J., holding, so far as here concerned, that the appraised values constituted the proper dutiable values of certain binoculars and cases and optical goods manufactured by Toyo Jitsugyo KK and exported from Japan during the period from July to September 1964. Bushnell International, Inc. v. United States, 64 Cust. Ct. 765, R.D. 11714, 314 F. Supp. 48 (1970). (Other merchandise covered by the decision of the trial court is not involved in this application.)

The parties are in agreement that export value, as…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Lollytogs, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  2. The United States v. Pan American Import Corp., M. H. Garvey Co., the United States v. Hub Floral Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Friedman v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  4. Hub Floral Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Park Avenue Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Globemaster Midwest, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Rattancraft of California v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Bushnell International, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  4. Dorco Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API