Legal Opinion

Esparza v. Scott and White Health Plan

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided August 16, 1995No. 03-94-00730-CVPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA ANN SMITH, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether a contractual agreement providing for a right of subrogation completely removes the issue of subrogation from the realm of equity.

Brenda and Jesus Esparza (the “Espar-zas”) settled a medical malpractice claim with Dr. Larry Orriek and King’s Daughters Clinic (collectively “Dr. Orriek”) for injuries sustained by their son, Zachary. Scott & White Health Plan (“Scott & White”) intervened in the Esparzas’ suit against Dr. Orriek, seeking recovery of $264,625 plus attorney’s fees from the Esparzas for expenses Scott & White had…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Garrity v. Rural Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Rimes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Ortiz v. Great Southern Fire & Casualty Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Duval County Ranch Co. v. Alamo Lumber Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1983
  5. Shelter Insurance Companies v. FrohlichNebraska Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Fortis Benefits v. CantuTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Murray v. Cadle Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. Osborne v. Jauregui, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2008
  4. Texas Ass'n of School Boards, Inc. v. Ward, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  5. Bay Rock Operating Co. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API