Legal Opinion

State v. Sondergaard

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 9, 1997No. 37606-3-IPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBecker, J.

Officer Michael Post responded to a 911 call placed by a renter of a hotel room. The caller wanted the police to remove Nicholette Sondergaard from the room because she was acting irrationally. After talking briefly with Sondergaard, Officer Post obtained her permission to search her purse. After searching the purse and finding drugs, Officer Post arrested Sondergaard and took her to a hospital.

Upon being charged with possession of a controlled substance, Sondergaard moved to suppress evidence of the drugs as obtained by a warrantless search to which she did not validly consent. The court…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  5. United States v. Douglas Edward RamboCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  3. State v. LakotiyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. LakotiyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API