Legal Opinion

Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 29, 2007No. 57011-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*37¶1 Vernon Braaten spent his career as a pipe fitter at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, where he was often exposed to asbestos. His job involved tearing into, removing, and replacing asbestos insulation used in and on the pumps, valves, and turbines he maintained. He sued the machine manufacturers, claiming that they should have warned about the danger of asbestos inhalation involved with using their products. Braaten first sued in Texas state court where, two weeks before trial, the court entered summary judgment in favor of one of the defendants. Braaten took a nonsuit against the remaining…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Taylor v. Elliott Turbomachinery Co. Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Simonetta v. Viad Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Braaten v. Saberhagen HoldingsWashington Supreme Court · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API