Legal Opinion

Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 29, 2007No. 57011-1-I, 56614-8-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

151 P.3d 1010 (2007)

Vernon BRAATEN, Appellant,

v.

SABERHAGEN HOLDINGS, a Washington Corporation, Bartells Asbestos Settlement Trust, a Washington Corporation; Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Forge Company); Crane Co; General Electric Company; Georgia-Pacific Corporation (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Bestwall Gympsum Company); Goulds Pumps, Incorporated; Guard-Line, Inc.; IMO Industries, Inc. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to De Laval Turbine, Inc. and Warren Pumps, Inc.); Ingersoll Rand Company; John Crane,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. McLeod v. Grant County School District No. 128Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Seattle-First National Bank v. TabertWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Ayers v. Johnson & Johnson Baby Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API