Colorado v. Connelly
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
In this case, the Supreme Court of Colorado held that the United States Constitution requires a court to suppress a confession when the mental state of the defendant, at the time he made the confession, interfered with his “rational intellect” and his “free will.” Because this decision seemed to conflict with prior holdings of this Court, we granted certiorari. 474 U. S. 1050 (1986). We conclude that the admissibility of this kind of statement is governed by state rules of evidence, rather than by our previous decisions regarding coerced confessions and Miranda waivers. We therefore reverse.
*160I
O…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3,249 opinions
- People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- Berghuis v. ThompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
3,244 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.