Legal Opinion
Hollister Park Inv. Co. v. Goleta Cty. Water Dist.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1978No. Civ. 52714PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THOMPSON, J.
This action reaches us on an appeal from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer was sustained without leave to amend. It raises a narrow issue of the right of a landowner denied access to the facilities of a water district to recover in inverse condemnation for the diminution in value of his property caused by lack of water. Determining that resolution of the issue is controlled by Selby Realty Co. v. City of San Buenaventura (1973) 10 Cal.3d 110 [109 Cal.Rptr. 799, 514 P.2d 111] and Swanson v. Marin Mun. Water Dist. (1976) 56 Cal.App.3d 512 [128 Cal.Rptr. 485], we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Swanson v. Marin Municipal Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Morshead v. California Regional Water Quality Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lockary v. KayfetzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association, Trustee, and Robecor, Inc. v. Summerland County Water District and Does I Through XvCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Executive Landscape Corp. v. San Vicente Country Villas IV Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Lockary v. KayfetzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.