Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Drabik v. Martz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided February 27, 1990No. C6-89-1620PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant Timothy D. Martz (“Martz”) seeks review of the trial court’s preliminary injunction prohibiting construction of a 600+ foot radio tower near the boundary waters canoe area (“BWCA”) pending trial on the merits of an action pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (“MERA”), Minn.Stat. ch. 116B (1988). We affirm.

FACTS

In 1986, Martz began searching for a site in northern Minnesota from which to broadcast 100,000 watts of FM radio signal. Martz states an interest in serving Cook County and Grand Marais, Minnesota. The criteria established by him, however,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. Minnesota Public Interest Research Group v. White Bear Rod & Gun ClubSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Eakman v. BrutgerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Miller v. FoleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Petition of GiblinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex. Rel. Wacouta Township v. Brunkow Hardwood Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
  2. Michels v. KozitzaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  3. Williams Pipeline Co. v. Soo Line RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Krmpotich v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Central Baptist Theological Seminary v. City of New BrightonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API