Legal Opinion
Michels v. Kozitza
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 16, 2000No. C6-99-1411PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
Appellant challenges a district court order denying his motion for an injunction barring a sheriffs execution sale of appellant’s real property. Appellant asserts that the district court erroneously interpreted the homestead exemption when it concluded that a parcel of his land that is noncontiguous with the parcel on which his home is situated is not covered by the exemption. He also alleges that res judi-cata and collateral estoppel barred respondent creditors from asserting that the exemption does not apply in this case. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant David Michels and his…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Dahlberg Brothers, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Hauser v. MealeySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State Ex Rel. Beaulieu v. RSJ, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Victory Highway Village, Inc. v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1979
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Quentin B. Stenzel, Debtor. Peoples' State Bank of Wells v. Quentin B. StenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Lyon Financial Services, Inc. v. WaddillCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re KyllonenUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- In Re Quentin B. Stenzel, Debtor. Peoples' State Bank of Wells v. Quentin B. StenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Peoples' State Bank v. Quentin B. StenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002