Legal Opinion

Mead v. Legacy Health System

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 28, 2009No. 040201947; A130969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant, Dr. Adler, an on-call neurosurgeon who gave advice over the telephone to an emergency room physician or resident physician concerning plaintiffs care. The case turns on whether the circumstances of that communication gave rise to a physician-patient relationship between defendant and plaintiff. The trial court denied plaintiffs motion for a directed verdict on the issue of the existence of a physician-patient relationship and submitted the question to the jury, with instructions as to what constitutes such a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brown v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. MillerOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. St. John v. PopeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Conway v. Pacific UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Zehr v. HaugenOregon Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mead v. Legacy Health SystemOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Regence Group v. Tig Specialty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
  3. Big River Construction, Inc. v. City of TillamookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. De Jaray v. Lattice Semiconductor CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
  5. Thompson v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API